panasonic-dmc-gh2-digital-slr-body

Blackmagic Pocket Cinema – Dedicated Video Camera

[dropcap]I[/dropcap] would recommend you take a look at the Panasonic GH2 and GH3. Being a Micro 4/3s camera, you can adapt almost any lens to the body (including ridiculous things like PL mount cinema lenses), which means you can buy older photography lenses for much cheaper than new lenses.

Best DSLR Camera for Videography Work

Many of the older lenses don’t have auto-focus, but if you’re shooting video you wouldn’t want to rely on that anyway. Another camera I would look into is the new Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera. It’s not really a DSLR per se, but it’s under $1,000, has a M 4/3 lens mount and shoots either RAW CinemaDNG files or ProRes 422 (HQ) files, which would go directly into Final Cut Pro. In my opinion, Canon really blew the doors off the DSLR video market with the 5D Mark II, but since then they haven’t really tried to innovate. Instead, they’re trying to push people into their much more expensive Cinema line (C100, C300, C500). They also keep releasing the same camera (essentially) in different camera bodies.

The 7D, T3i, 60D, T4i, etc. all have the same exact sensor. And their lenses are way too expensive. Nikon cameras are great for stills and they’ve been lagging behind for video, but apparently their new D5200 is really great. I haven’t used it personally, but EOSHD seems to love it. The GH3 (body) costs about $1,300, but the GH2 (body) is now about $600-700. B&H is no longer carrying the GH2, but I’m sure you can find it on eBay. One of the biggest differences between the two is the build quality — the GH2 is plastic and the GH3 is magnesium alloy, which is weather sealed. Once hacked, the GH2 is a real beast. Shane Carruth shot Upstream Color on it. The overall image quality of the Pocket will undoubtedly be way better than the T3i, but from what I’ve read, I can’t tell if the Pocket is capable of taking stills or not.

I find it hard to believe Blackmagic would not include that feature, but it is a video camera as opposed to a DSLR that happens to take video.

Share on Google Plus
  • http://twitter.com/planetMitch planetMitch

    The new BlackMagic Pocket Cinema Camera doesn’t take “stills” but since it’s video is made of 24fps DNG files, you essentially have 24 stills per second. It seems silly that they don’t include stills as a feature – since it could basically just be a one frame video and is a software thing, but it is only a movie camera at this point.

  • Christian

    Anyone investing in photo/video should be looking at lenses as much if not more than the camera itself. Cameras come and go but good glass will last a lifetime.
    m4/3 lenses will not throw a large enough circle to cover a super 35mm sensor – which is just about every camera that captures motion images (with the exception of the BMCC and BMPC). Its true you can adapt a number of cinema PL lenses – but are you really going to put a $30,000 lens and $500 adapter on a $600 camera body? If you were to invest in the GH-2 or GH-3 camera system, you would have to start all over if you ever upgraded to a super35 or full frame camera. EF mount lenses (designed for full-frame 35mm coverage) will fit on RED Epic and Scarlet, Sony F5&F55, Blackmagic’s production camera, Canon EOS and DSLR. They are also available at just about any price/quality point.

    • charlie

      Not really. You can just use an adapter and get full frame lenses which you’ll use in the future anyways. That’s what I’m going to be doing with the GH3.

  • FrankOO

    Anyone who disrespects cinema lenses in the first sentence of a review of a “toy” camera is ignorant of what they are speaking. In my opinion, you have no credibility with the prosumer market.

  • http://twitter.com/DslrVideoStudio DSLR VIDEO STUDIO™

    Micro Four-thirds camera with interchangable lenses that shoot HD are a great buy for many due to cost and size.